|
Spirithome > Scripture > Living with the Bible
It's often said in mainline Protestant churches that the Bible is only the Word of God when it is read with faith. I myself would not put it quite that way. It seems to me that there is something about the Bible that is the Spirit's own, in a way that nothing else is. Christians acknowledge this in saying that the Spirit inspired the actual writings and speeches (such as by the prophets, story-tellers and editors) that led to the writings. If so, much of the Spirit's greatness should have rubbed off on it. One way to see if it's so is to see if it bears a key mark of God's Word : it does not come back empty. Does the Bible meet this standard even in non-believers' hands? Yes. For all of this modern culture's disbelief and cynical bitterness, it's not at all rare to see the Bible's effect. Even in the hands on those who don't believe in Christ or even in a god, whether in art or literature, diplomacy or politics, family life or inner transcendent longings, and whenever people speak of peace or justice or morality or character or vision, something of the Bible's words, meanings, ethics, and intents do in fact come through. Sometimes those doing it have no idea where it came from; sometimes they know full well and ignore or reject God but still learn from the truths God put into the Bible. It does not come back empty. There are other measures of the Bible's nature as God's Word too, and it measures up on all counts.
Christians learned to trust the writings of the Bible by way of experience, over generations, repeatedly seeing how it leads us to what's good and true. Yet Christians sometimes talk as if everybody knows this, as if you could go up to just anyone and say 'the Bible says "do this"', and they'll jump to attention and say, "yes, sir!". To be blunt: Most people who do not believe in Christ do not believe in the Bible. The Bible still has some limited degree of respect from almost everyone, but if they're not already committed to it by faith, odds are it'll do no good to try to convince them of anything solely (or even mainly) from the Bible. It's not an authority to them because they don't believe in the One who stands behind it. Christ's followers, however, have discovered how clueless they are about following Christ. We found out how it is the Bible that clues us in.
|
5) People often quote single verses of Scripture and insist "the Bible says." Is this a proper use of God's Holy Word?
|
........... GET TO THE POINT !Even though all that is true, that's not why the Bible
is here. The Bible was not written, gathered, and kept
over the years just to be a bin for holding grand truths
and stories with morals that have good effects. Though
anyone can find in it (or be led by the Spirit to find in
it) answers to many great mysteries, and even find from
it the right questions to ask, the Bible is not a
question book or an answer book. It's not enough to just
study Scripture, or to be able to remember a Bible verse
at any given moment. When the Bible is read without
faith, it misses the whole point of having the Bible.
Sure, you might develop strength of character from its
examples, pattern your life according to the moral values
in it, and even impact the world with something it taught
you. But that's not why it's there. The Bible was
written with a very different purpose in mind : the
Spirit uses it to reveal the purpose, vision, and
love of God, and to start, shape, and deepen faith
in Christ. The Spirit made it to show how Christ
recreated our relationship with God. The Bible is great
because of the Great One who stands behind it and that
Great One's love for us, a love that came to us, suffered death, and
overcame even death so that we might also overcome it.
The medium (of print or speech or Web) is not the
message; the God who Reveals is the message, and the
medium is just the messenger. Even more, the message is
that of a love letter, not that of a rap sheet or a facts
list. And like with a love letter, it's not so much how
it's said than Who says it and why. |
The Bible screams to be read with faith. But it really matters what faith one has. Case in point : Saul of Tarsus. He had read the Hebrew Scriptures all his life long. He was even trained in the school of thought and practice which was slowly developing what would eventually become the Talmud. He thoroughly believed in God -- not just any god, but the God of Abraham and Sarah, of Moses and of David -- and probably believed strongly enough to give up his life if need be (a very real possibility in Roman times). By all the standards of Scripture as revealed up to Jesus' time, he was following God as he should have. But those standards had been radically changed only a few years earlier, and God set about to break through all that Saul knew. God didn't use Scripture to make the breakthrough. There was no New Testament yet to bear the new Word, since people were still busy living the New Testament. So God created an experience that would open Saul up to the truth : Saul was blinded. When his blindness ended, he had new eyes for seeing what had already been revealed in a new light : a new Word. Saul was no longer Saul, but Paul. And Paul went on to live, and write, that new revelation, as the author of letters and as the foremost evangelist of all. The light that the Spirit shed through Paul's life and pen, in turn, now lights our way.
God doesn't speak objectively or dispassionately. So, why should God's Word be studied objectively or dispassionately? Only one reason is good enough : to better understand it so that our passions, our limitations, or our prejudices don't blind us. One way to think of it is this : when writing, a writer might use brackets [ ] or parentheses/clommers ( ) to make an aside or take care of a side track or add a needed reference or make a corrective statement. It's good to 'bracket out' the passion of one's faith briefly, to get it out of the way of what the Spirit is really saying through the Bible passages you're studying. Brackets are useful, but only within the context of making the unbracketed whole easier to understand. When 'bracketing' in Bible study, the bracketed 'objective' look at the passage(s) is to be done within the context of a passionate faith in the Word outside of the brackets, for the sake of making that whole life of faith better and stronger. The more objective view may well include scholarly methods or measures, logical thinking, history, and measuring up the interpretations against other evidence. All sound methods soundly pursued are worthy of use, but they are to be done in brackets set within the whole picture.
The Spirit works hard within us to get us to grasp what God has done and is doing and will do. The moments when God's revelation hits home is sometimes described as a Hmmm... or an Aha... moment. But Hmm... and Aha.... happen regularly to anyone whose brain isn't switched off. Sometimes, though, it's a lot more than that. Reformed writer Gabriel Fackre caught these moments better by calling it a 'eureka experience'. It's got WOW to it. It breaks through the smog of life. If you try to use a room fan to clear out a fog bank, it fails because it's too small; you can't cut through the smog with it. But the Spirit's got a hugely powerful light that burns its way right thorough it. It's a potent gift from God.
When you keep plugging away at Bible study, the Spirit rewards you for it. You may not notice it, but you are being shaped and built up brick by brick as you learn God's Word. What is unfamiliar turf at first eventually becomes familiar. One lesson builds upon another, and a vision starts taking shape. The big picture comes into view. Each time you go back to a passage of Scripture or read a Bible story again, you understand it better because of all that you've discovered since last time. And you can see more of how you are to live it out in the world around you. It takes a lifetime, and even then it's not complete, because the New World you're being rebuilt for is not complete. One day, it will be. But you'll have to trust that to the Spirit who's building it.
|
There are many terms Christians use when they describe the Bible and its role. You'll often see these in doctrinal statements of faith or in textbooks. For instance, Authority, Canon, Decisive, Effective, Essential, Infallible, Inspired, Instructional, Literal, Norm, Revelation, Source, Standard, Supreme, Trustworthy, and Unique. Christian thinkers argue (sometimes hotly) about how good it is to use these terms, but each of them, and others like them, are meant to say something helpful about the Bible. |
There's also something called "biblical criticism", which is a scholarly
effort to peel back the layers of work that created the Bible
to find what was originally in each layer of writings, and why
each layer came about. One leading example of this is the Documentary
Hypothesis, on how the first five books (Genesis, Exodus,
Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy) came to be. Such scholarly
study can often be very helpful. For one example, it teaches us
that while the way the Spirit formed the Bible is more focused
and intense, there are key ways in which it is like the way the
Spirit works among us for other tasks. Yet sometimes scholarly
study can pull you away from the reason for reading the Bible. At
all times you must keep in mind that scholarly study uses good
and bad scholarly theories. For many centuries it has been
observed that the fewer people there are who actually
believe the Bible, the more scholarly studies there are
about the Bible. Søren
Kierkegaard (in his *Journals*, #216) suggested that we
might gather up all copies of the New Testament in one place,
then pray that God would take them back, because we humans deal
so poorly with it. He thought of returning it to God because
the only hope for the Bible in his time was divine action. But
it has always been so, and God has kept taking action for the
Bible - thank God.
to top
"Faith is the master, and
reason the maid-servant."
----- Martin Luther
"Consider that the first
time someone spoke of God in the third person and therefore no
longer with God but about God was that very moment when the
question resounded, 'Did God really say?' (Genesis 3:1). This
fact ought to make us think."
----- Helmut Thielicke
"Through this experience I found
that the Bible was not adequate. I needed God in a personal way
-- not as an object of my study, but as friend, guide,
comforter. I needed an existential experience of the Holy One.
Quite frankly, I found that the Bible was not the answer. I
found the Scriptures to be helpful -- even authoritatively
helpful -- as a guide. But without my feeling God, the Bible
gave me little solace.
In the midst of this 'summer from hell', I
began to examine what had become of my faith. I found a longing
to get closer to God, but found myself unable to do so through
my normal means: exegesis, Scripture reading, more exegesis. I
believe that I had depersonalized God so much that when I
really needed him I didn't know how to relate."
----- Daniel Wallace, about what happened during his
son's bout with rare cancer. In *Christianity Today*, 12
Sept 1994.
"Perhaps there will be many Christians to whom it would not occur to pose the question whether the process of secularization has anything to do with the biblical understanding of the goal of history. The Bible, for them, belongs to a religious world which is not admitted to belong to the world of secular events... But this is to read the Bible wrongly. Whatever else it may be, the Bible is a secular book dealing with the sort of events which a news editor accepts for publication in a daily newspaper; it is concerned with secular events, wars, revolutions, enslavements and liberations, migrants and refugees, famines and epidemics and all the rest... We miss this because we do not sufficiently treat the Bible as a whole. When we do this, we see at once that the Bible... is in its main design a universal history. It is an interpretation of human history as a whole, beginning with the saga of creation and ending with a vision of the gathering together of all the nations and the consummation of God's purpose for mankind."
----- Lesslie Newbigin, *Honest Religion for Secular Man*
|
More about the Bible: |
|
Let us ask the Lord to broaden
our ideas, make them clearer, and bring them closer to the
truth, that we might also understand the other matters which He
has revealed to His prophets. May we study the Holy Spirit's
writings under the guidance of that same Spirit and compare one
spiritual interpretation with another, so that our explanation
of the texts may be worthy of God and the Holy Spirit whom
inspired them. May we do this through Jesus Christ our Lord, to
whom glory and power belong -- and will belong throughout the
ages.
----- Origen
|
||
about this site ||
what spiritual words mean ||
subject index. If you like this site, please link to it, and tell others about it. |
Read this page in your own language! |
| ver.: 12 June 2010 The Bible. Copyright © Robert Longman Jr. |